I don't watch soccer games because, well, for two main reasons: (1) I don't understand soccer, and (2) there is a lot of running around with few goals scored. That being said, it is Woman's World Cup time, and the Americans are playing right now.
Sunday, Team USA played Brazil, one of the powerhouses of women's soccer. Already Germany surprisingly lost, perhaps the best women's soccer team in the world. Some would say that Brazil was number two. Now they are out. But instead of guessing what Team USA's chances are in the semi-finals, I want to chat for a bit about the game. Or at least two different perceptions.
Again, I did not watch the game, but I Googled the team names to see who was winning. I got to FIFA's site (they are the international organization in charge of world soccer – the second 'F' in their name is football, what the rest of the world calls soccer), and they had the statistics for the game. In the second minute, the Brazilian's scored a goal in its own side, giving the American's a 1-0 lead. Then the Brazilian's scored a penalty shot goal and another goal, giving them a 2-1 lead. At that point, I was out in the yard, pulling weeds and trimming bushes. To me, it appeared as if Team USA did not score anything. I came back inside, showered, and then surprisingly found out that Team USA scored a last minute goal to tie the game in overtime, and then won in a shootout. My perception, just looking at the statistics, well, I thought Team USA was extremely lucky and should not have advanced. But then I read an article that put things in a new perspective.
The Brazilian's first goal (a penalty shot). Well, they missed the penalty shot, but the refs thought the Americans were not set properly, and they gave the Brazil team another change, which they converted into a goal (apparently the call the refs made is rarely called). And their second goal was a goal made when a Brazilian player was offsides. I never understood offsides, and apparently, on this play, the refs didn't either. The second goal that was a bit suspect. So some think the game should have ended in the USA's 2-0 win against Team Brazil. There was also a red card and yellow card penalty against Team USA that seemed excessive.
So the statistics and what happened in the game had two different perspectives. Whatever the case, Team USA now plays France. I am not going to watch this game either, but I am wondering if I should just read an article instead of relying on statistics. Or you can find the highlights, hoping that the camera catches an image of a hottie soccer fan.
My Interview on Decorating Early for Christmas
5 hours ago
6 comments:
that sounds much like my following of the world cup, and soccer in general. Although I did play when I was 4 or 5...
And thanks for the hottie :-)
I love soccer. When you watch it on ESPN sportscenter that is. I played it as a kid, its OK if you play it but a bore if you watch it. But watching it on ESPN makes it worthwhile, you only see the scores and lets face it for a game that lasts some 90 minutes plus extra time (which is time ONLY known by the ref) then overtimes then a penalty shootout, well for missing 2 plus hours to see 1 minute of scoring is good enuf.
Its like watching full length porn but only watching the climax. Sort of LOL
I came for the pictures evidently ;)
michael: you are welcome concerning the hottie. That sounded strange, didn't it?
larry: sounds like you watch sportscenter for porn as well. Only for the money shots, so to speak.
xmichra: if I am writing about soccer, the only way to keep someone interested is to post a picture of a hot soccer fan, particularly from Brazil.
Sometimes I believe soccer is more subjective than figure skating. In the past few months, officiating has come under scrutiny and if international soccer is anything like anything international, it's rife with corruption.
Judging from your commentary, it's another reason I don't like soccer.
Your commentary was good, soccer is what I don't like. Just clarifying.
Post a Comment